课程咨询

GRE首页 GRE课程 GRE动态 0元讲座 GRE模考网站

新东方在线 > GRE > GRE阅读 > 正文
扫码关注掌握一手留学资讯

扫码关注掌握一手留学资讯

回复XDF免费领

水平测试和备考资料

扫码关注公众号

GRE阅读模拟在线练习附答案一百五十八

2018-11-07 17:10:01来源：网络

　　对于GRE阅读部分，最好的练习资料就是模拟资料。通过模拟练习，可以让大家更好地发现自己在备考中的不足，重点攻克自己的短板内容，有效的提升阅读分数。下面新东方在线GRE频道为大家整理了详细的内容，供大家参考。

点击查看》》》【GRE阅读真题在线练习附答案汇总】

　　Traditionally, the study of history has had fixed boundaries and focal points—periods, countries, dramatic events, and great leaders. It also has had clear and firm notions of scholarly procedure: how one inquires into a historical problem, how one presents and documents one's findings, what constitutes admissible and adequate proof.

　　Anyone who has followed recent historical literature can testify to the revolution that is taking place in historical studies. The currently fashionable subjects come directly from the sociology catalog: childhood, work, leisure. The new subjects are accompanied by new methods. Where history once was primarily narrative, it is now entirely analytic. The old　questions "What happened?" and "How did it happen?" have given way to the　question "Why did it happen?" Prominent among the methods used to answer the question "Why" is psychoanalysis, and its use has given rise to psychohistory.

　　Psychohistory does not merely use psychological explanations in historical contexts. Historians have always used such explanations when they were appropriate and when there was sufficient evidence for them. But this pragmatic use　of psychology is not what psychohisto-rians intend. They are committed, not just to psychology in general, but to Freudian psychoanalysis. This commitment precludes a commitment to history as historians have always understood it. Psychohistory derives its "facts" not from history, the detailed records of events and their consequences, but from psychoanalysis of the individuals who made history, and deduces its theories not from this or that instance in their lives, but from a view of human nature that transcends history. It denies the basic criterion of historical evidence: that evidence be publicly accessible to, and therefore assessable by, all historians. And it violates the basic 　　tenet of historical method: that be alert to the negative instances that would refute their theses. Psychohistorians, convinced of the absolute rightness of their own　theories, are also convinced that theirs　is the "deepest" explanation of any　event, that other explanations fall short of the truth.

　　Psychohistory is not content to violate the discipline of history (in the sense of the proper mode of studying and writing about the past); it also violates the past itself. It denies to the past an integrity and will of its own, in which people acted out of a variety of motives and in which events had a multiplicity of causes and effects. It imposes upon the past the same determinism that it imposes upon the present, thus robbing people and events of their individuality and of their complexity. Instead of respecting the particularity of the past, it assimilates all events, past and present, into a single deterministic schema that is　presumed to be true at all times and in all circumstances.

本文关键字: GRE阅读练习 GRE阅读 GRE

上一页 1 2 下一页

添加新东方美研助教回复【GRE】获取

模考真题|写作题库|阅读机经|佛脚词汇

更多资料

添加美研助教号，
回复【GRE】获取备考必看资料包

  • 1.打开手机微信【扫一扫】，识别上方二维码；
  • 2.点击【添加美研助教号】，回复对应关键字领取学习资料。
更多>>
更多内容

关注新东方美研助教

回复【GRE】获取备考必看资料包

新东方美研备考资料
GRE/GMAT直播精讲小班 GRE/GMAT精讲智能系统课 托福直播/精讲课（30天/60天）
更多>>
更多惊喜>>

添加美研助教号，
回复【GRE】获取备考必看资料包

  • 1.打开手机微信【扫一扫】，识别上方二维码；
  • 2.点击【添加美研助教号】，回复对应关键字领取学习资料。
更多>>
更多资料
我要
反馈 返回
首页
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10