课程咨询
扫码关注掌握一手留学资讯

扫码关注掌握一手留学资讯

回复XDF免费领

水平测试和备考资料

扫码关注公众号

GRE写作满分范文十八

2018-07-25 17:25:00来源:网络

  GRE写作想要在短时间内得到提升,大家可以多看一些满分范文,这有助于大家更好地了解写作高分的秘诀,新东方在线GRE频道为大家整理了相关的范文,供大家参考学习。希望对大家接下里的写作备考有更好的帮助。

【点击查看GRE写作满分范文汇总】

  The following appeared as a letter to the editor of a local newspaper.

  "Five years ago, we residents of Morganton voted to keep the publicly owned piece of land known as Scott Woods in a natural, undeveloped state. Our thinking was that, if no shopping centers or houses were built there, Scott Woods would continue to benefit our community as a natural parkland. But now that our town planning committee wants to purchase the land and build a school there, we should reconsider this issue. If the land becomes a school site, no shopping centers or houses can be built there, and substantial acreage would probably be devoted to athletic fields. There would be no better use of land in our community than this, since a large majority of our children participate in sports, and Scott Woods would continue to benefit our community as natural parkland."

  The author's argument is weak. Though he believes Scott Woods benefits the community as an undeveloped park, he also thinks a school should be built on it. Obviously the author is not aware of the development that comes with building a school besides the facilities devoted to learning or sports. He does not realize that parking lots will take up a substantial area of property, especially if the school proposed is a high school. We are not given this information, nor the size of the student body that will be attending, nor the population of the city itself, so it is unclear whether the damage will be great or marginal. For a better argument, the author should consider questions like what sort of natural resources are present on the land that will not remain once the school is built? Are there endangered species whose homes will be lost? And what about digging up the land for water lines? It is doubtful whether the integrity of Scott Woods as natural parkland can be maintained once the land has been developed. It is true that a school would probably not cause as much damage as a shopping center or housing development, but the author must consider whether the costs incurred in losing the park-like aspects of the property are worth developing it, when there could be another, more suitable site. He should also consider how the city will pay for the property, whether taxes will be raised to compensate for the expense or whether a shopping center will be built somewhere else to raise funds. He has not given any strong reasons for the idea of building a school, including what kind of land the property is, whether it is swampland that will have to be drained or an arid, scrubby lot that will need extensive maintenance to keep up the athletic greens. The author should also consider the opposition, such as the people without children who have no interest in more athletic fields. He must do a better job of presenting his case, addressing each point named above, for if the land is as much a popular community resource as he implies, he will face a tough time gaining allies to change a park to a school.

  Comments:

  After describing the argument as "weak," this strong response goes straight to the heart of the matter: building a school is not (as the argument seems to assume) innocuous; rather, it involves substantial development. The essay identifies several reasons to support this critique. The writer then points to the important questions that must be answered before accepting the proposal. These address

  -- the costs versus the benefits of developing Scott Woods

  -- the impact of development on Scott Woods

  -- the possibility of "another, more suitable site"

  The generally thoughtful analysis notes still more flaws in the argument:

  -- whether the school is necessary

  -- whether the selected site is appropriate

  -- whether some groups might oppose the plan

  Although detailed and comprehensive, the writer's critique is neither as fully developed nor as tightly organized as required for a 6 essay. The response exhibits good control of language, although there is some awkward phrasing (e.g., ".??爂aining allies to change a park to a school"). Overall, this essay warrants a score of 5 because it is well developed, clearly organized, and shows facility with language.

  以上就是为大家整理的“GRE写作满分范文十八”,更多GRE精彩内容请持续关注本频道的更新!


2月GRE公开课,助力GRE备考-1元抢报!

添加新东方美研助教回复【GRE】获取

模考真题|写作题库|阅读机经|佛脚词汇

更多资料
更多>>
  • GRE写作题目如何正确练习   

      为了帮助大家高效备考GRE,新东方在线GRE频道为大家带来GRE写作题目如何正确练习,希望对大家GRE备考有所帮助。更多精彩尽请关注新东方

    来源 : 网络 2021-01-25 13:23:00 关键字 : GRE写作 GRE

  • GRE写作考前的小练习   

      为了帮助大家高效备考GRE,新东方在线GRE频道为大家带来GRE写作考前的小练习,希望对大家GRE备考有所帮助。更多精彩尽请关注新东方在线

    来源 : 网络 2021-01-25 13:23:00 关键字 : GRE写作 GRE

  • GRE写作的标准了解   

      为了帮助大家高效备考GRE,新东方在线GRE频道为大家带来GRE写作的标准了解,希望对大家GRE备考有所帮助。更多精彩尽请关注新东方在线GR

    来源 : 网络 2021-01-25 13:23:00 关键字 : GRE写作 GRE

  • GRE写作的名言警句   

      为了帮助大家高效备考GRE,新东方在线GRE频道为大家带来GRE写作的名言警句,希望对大家GRE备考有所帮助。更多精彩尽请关注新东方在线GR

    来源 : 网络 2021-01-25 13:23:00 关键字 : GRE写作 GRE

  • GRE写作怎么应对高频题目   

      为了帮助大家高效备考GRE,新东方在线GRE频道为大家带来GRE写作怎么应对高频题目,希望对大家GRE备考有所帮助。更多精彩尽请关注新东方

    来源 : 网络 2021-01-25 13:23:00 关键字 : GRE写作 GRE

  • GRE写作提分的建议   

      为了帮助大家高效备考GRE,新东方在线GRE频道为大家带来GRE写作提分的建议,希望对大家GRE备考有所帮助。更多精彩尽请关注新东方在线GR

    来源 : 网络 2021-01-25 13:23:00 关键字 : GRE写作 GRE

  • GRE写作常用的词汇   

      为了帮助大家高效备考GRE,新东方在线GRE频道为大家带来GRE写作常用的词汇,希望对大家GRE备考有所帮助。更多精彩尽请关注新东方在线GR

    来源 : 网络 2021-01-25 13:23:00 关键字 : GRE写作 GRE

  • GRE写作的素材介绍   

      为了帮助大家高效备考GRE,新东方在线GRE频道为大家带来GRE写作的素材介绍,希望对大家GRE备考有所帮助。更多精彩尽请关注新东方在线GR

    来源 : 网络 2021-01-25 13:23:00 关键字 : GRE写作 GRE

  • GRE写作模板的运用方法   

      为了帮助大家高效备考GRE,新东方在线GRE频道为大家带来GRE写作模板的运用方法,希望对大家GRE备考有所帮助。更多精彩尽请关注新东方在

    来源 : 网络 2021-01-25 13:23:00 关键字 : GRE写作 GRE

  • GRE写作如何更新颖   

      为了帮助大家高效备考GRE,新东方在线GRE频道为大家带来GRE写作如何更新颖,希望对大家GRE备考有所帮助。更多精彩尽请关注新东方在线GR

    来源 : 网络 2021-01-25 13:23:00 关键字 : GRE写作 GRE

更多内容

关注新东方美研助教

回复【GRE】获取备考必看资料包

新东方美研备考资料
更多>>
更多惊喜>>
更多>>
更多资料