以GRE写作为例看ETS官方解读OG

　　新东方在线GRE频道为大家带来以GRE写作为例看ETS官方解读OG一文，希望对大家GRE备考有所帮助。更多精彩尽请关注新东方在线GRE频道!

　　我们对于OG都有各种各样的解读，那么我们今天就来看一下ETS官方是怎样解读的?下面我们就以Issue部分第一题的6分范文和官方评价为例，来看看ETS的评分思路。

　　As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.

　　Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.

　　Essay Response — Score 6

　　【paraphrase题目中逻辑联系：即technology对free thinking的阻碍】The statement linking technology negatively with free thinking plays on recent human experience over the past century.

　　【肯定作者观点的部分正确性，即肯定大背景—科技发展给人们生活带来的便利(还没讲到依赖性)，但没有对作者的逻辑作出评论(即对科技的依赖使得思考能力下降)】Surely there has been no time in history where the lived lives of people have changed more dramatically.

　　【用具体例子表现科技发展给人们生活带来的方便】A quick reflection on a typical day reveals how technology has revolutionized the world. Most people commute to work in an automobile that runs on an internal combustion engine. During the workday, chances are high that the employee will interact with a computer that processes information on silicon bridges that are .09 microns wide. Upon leaving home, family members will be reached through wireless networks that utilize satellites orbiting the earth. Each of these common occurrences could have been inconceivable at the turn of the 19th century.

　　【再次paraphrase题目观点】The statement attempts to bridge these dramatic changes to a reduction in the ability for humans to think for themselves.

　　【指出作者的逻辑本身是一个assumption，本身就是最好的反驳】The assumption is that an increased reliance on technology negates the need for people to think creatively to solve previous quandaries.

　　【refer to首段用到的例子：technology可以解决问题】Looking back at the introduction, one could argue that without a car, computer, or mobile phone, the hypothetical worker would need to find alternate methods of transport, information processing and communication. Technology short circuits this thinking(the need to find alternate methods of transport, information processing and communication) by making the problems obsolete.

　　【转折，在承认人们对technology的reliance之后，提出这种reliance并非是坏的】However, this reliance on technology does not necessarily preclude the creativity that marks the human species.

　　【把对technology依赖的好处具体化，进一步否定题设】The prior examples reveal that technology allows for convenience. The car, computer and phone all release additional time for people to live more efficiently. This efficiency does not preclude the need for humans to think for themselves.

　　【再进一步：technology怎样促进人类思考，因为它制造新的问题】 In fact, technology frees humanity to not only tackle new problems, but may itself create new issues that did not exist without technology.

　　【具体例子体现】For example, the proliferation of automobiles has introduced a need for fuel conservation on a global scale. With increasing energy demands from emerging markets, global warming becomes a concern inconceivable to the horse-and-buggy generation. Likewise dependence on oil has created nation-states that are not dependent on taxation, allowing ruling parties to oppress minority groups such as women. Solutions to these complex problems require the unfettered imaginations of maverick scientists and politicians.

　　【再进一步，明确指出technology怎样free human imagination，而不仅仅是思考】In contrast to the statement, we can even see how technology frees the human imagination.

　　【具体例子1体现上述观点】Consider how the digital revolution and the advent of the internet has allowed for an unprecedented exchange of ideas. WebMD, a popular internet portal for medical information, permits patients to self research symptoms for a more informed doctor visit. This exercise opens pathways of thinking that were previously closed off to the medical layman. With increased interdisciplinary interactions, inspiration can arrive from the most surprising corners.

　　【具体例子2体现上述观点】Jeffrey Sachs, one of the architects of the UN Millenium Development Goals, based his ideas on emergency care triage techniques. The unlikely marriage of economics and medicine has healed tense, hyperinflation environments from South America to Eastern Europe.

　　【总结例子，再次重申观点】This last example provides the most hope in how technology actually provides hope to the future of humanity. By increasing our reliance on technology, impossible goals can now be achieved. Consider how the late 20th century witnessed the complete elimination of smallpox. This disease had ravaged the human race since prehistorical days, and yet with the technology of vaccines, free thinking humans dared to imagine a world free of smallpox. Using technology, battle plans were drawn out, and smallpox was systematically targeted and eradicated.

　　注：通过前面一步步铺垫，通过从反驳technology阻碍思维，到technology引发思维，到technology可以帮助人们达到从前不可能的目标，进而引入free thinking humans的概念。

　　【总结+升华：我们应该以充满希望的姿势迎接科技给人类imagination带来的无限可能】Technology will always mark the human experience, from the discovery of fire to the implementation of nanotechnology. Given the history of the human race, there will be no limit to the number of problems, both new and old, for us to tackle. There is no need to retreat to a Luddite attitude to new things, but rather embrace a hopeful posture to the possibilities that technology provides for new avenues of human imagination.

　　段落结构分析

　　第一段

　　【paraphrase题目中逻辑联系：即technology对free thinking的阻碍】

　　【肯定作者观点的部分正确性，即肯定大背景—科技发展给人们生活带来的便利(还没讲到依赖性)，但没有对作者的逻辑作出评论(即对科技的依赖使得思考能力下降)】

　　【用具体例子表现科技发展给人们生活带来的方便】

　　第二段

　　【再次paraphrase题目观点】

　　【指出作者的逻辑本身是一个assumption，本身就是最好的反驳】

　　【refer to首段用到的例子：technology可以解决问题】

　　第三段

　　【转折，在承认人们对technology的reliance之后，提出这种reliance并非是坏的】

　　【把对technology依赖的好处具体化，进一步否定题设】

　　【再进一步：technology的作用怎样促进人类思考，因为它制造新的问题】

　　【具体例子体现】

　　【再进一步，明确指出technology怎样free human imagination，而不仅仅是思考】

　　【具体例子1体现上述观点】

　　【具体例子2体现上述观点】

　　【总结例子，再次重申观点】

　　第四段

　　【总结+升华：我们应该以充满希望的姿势迎接科技给人类imagination带来的无限可能】

　　以上就是新东方在线GRE频道为你带来的以GRE写作为例看ETS官方解读OG，更多精彩敬请关注新东方在线GRE频道。