课程咨询

GRE首页 GRE课程 GRE动态 0元讲座 GRE模考网站

新东方在线 > GRE > GRE阅读 > 正文
扫码关注掌握一手留学资讯

扫码关注掌握一手留学资讯

回复XDF免费领

水平测试和备考资料

扫码关注公众号

GRE阅读逻辑题训练(58)

2017-04-02 09:15:00来源：新东方在线整理

　　为了帮助大家练习GRE阅读逻辑题，新东方在线GRE频道为大家带来GRE阅读逻辑题训练(58)一文，希望对大家GRE备考有所帮助。更多精彩尽请关注新东方在线GRE频道!

　　During the last hunting season, twice as many people were hit by cars while walking on public sidewalks as were hurt in hunting accidents in the woods. Therefore, during the last hunting season, people were safer in the woods than they were while walking in public sidewalks.

　　In evaluating the argument above, it would be most important to know.

　　A：the likelihood that during the next hunting season fewer people will be hurt in hunting accidents in the woods than were hurt during the last hunting season

　　B：the ratio during last hunting season of people who walked on public sidewalks to people who were in the woods

　　C：how many of the people hurt in hunting accidents during the last hunting season had been hurt in similar accidents in the past

　　D：how many of the accidents could have been avoided if the drivers of the cars or the hunters who fired the gun had been more careful

　　E：how many people, on average, are hurt in hunting accidents in the woods when it is not hunting season

　　最佳解析：上文推理为“人行道上交通事故被伤害的人是树林中打猎事故里被伤害的人的两倍，所以在树林中比在人行道上安全”。本题由一个数字的事实得到结论，结论是对上面事实的说明。显然这个推理荒谬，但如何评价它呢?(A)next与last的比较与上面“in the woods”和“on public sidewalk”无关。(B)涉及上面推理中的比较，指出人行道走路人与树林中的人的比率，如果这个比例大于2，则反对上面推理，如果小于2则支持上述推理。所以(B)is correct。(C)(D)(E)中均与上述推理无关。

　　答案：B

更多GRE备考资料下载请点击这里

　　以上就是新东方在线GER频道为你带来的GRE阅读逻辑题训练题目，更多精彩敬请关注新东方在线GRE频道。

本文关键字: GRE阅读难句 GRE阅读考点练习

添加新东方美研助教回复【GRE】获取

模考真题|写作题库|阅读机经|佛脚词汇

更多资料

添加美研助教号，
回复【GRE】获取备考必看资料包

  • 1.打开手机微信【扫一扫】，识别上方二维码；
  • 2.点击【添加美研助教号】，回复对应关键字领取学习资料。
更多>>
更多内容

关注新东方美研助教

回复【GRE】获取备考必看资料包

新东方美研备考资料
GRE/GMAT直播精讲小班 GRE/GMAT精讲智能系统课 托福直播/精讲课（30天/60天）
更多>>
更多惊喜>>

添加美研助教号，
回复【GRE】获取备考必看资料包

  • 1.打开手机微信【扫一扫】，识别上方二维码；
  • 2.点击【添加美研助教号】，回复对应关键字领取学习资料。
更多>>
更多资料
我要
反馈 返回
首页
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10