课程咨询
扫码关注掌握一手留学资讯

扫码关注掌握一手留学资讯

回复XDF免费领

水平测试和备考资料

扫码关注公众号

GRE写作北美范文:例证对史学家构建历史必要性

2014-05-02 22:35:01来源:网络

本文是新东方在线为广大考生整理的GRE写作北美范文:例证对史学家构建历史必要性,希望帮助大家解决GMAT考试难题,取得好的成绩。

  4月份GRE考试已结束,同学们需进入下轮GRE备考中,备考GRE首先要选择好的资料,GRE北美范文对备考GRE写作有一定的指导作用,下面为大家整理了最完整版的GRE北美范文,主要是关于GRE ISSUE作文范文,供大家应用。

  "When we concern ourselves with the study of history, we become storytellers. Because we can never know the past directly but must construct it by interpreting evidence, exploring history is more of a creative enterprise than it is an objective pursuit. All historians are storytellers."

  Are all historians essentially storytellers, for the reasons that the speaker cites? In asserting that we can never know the past directly, the speaker implies that we truly "know" only what we experience first-hand. Granting this premise, I agree that it is the proper and necessary role of historians to "construct" history by interpreting evidence. Nevertheless, the speaker's characterization of this role as "storytelling" carries certain unfair implications, which should be addressed.

  One reason why I agree with the speaker's fundamental claim lies in the distinction between the role of historian and the roles of archivist and journalist. By "archivist" I refer generally to any person whose task is to document and preserve evidence of past events. And by "journalist" I mean any person whose task is to record, by writing, film, or some other media, factual events as they occur--for the purpose of creating evidence of those events. It is not the proper function of either the journalist or the archivist to tell a story. Rather, it is their function to provide evidence to the historian, who then pieces together the evidence to construct history, as the speaker suggests. In other words, unless we grant to the historian a license to "construct" history by interpreting evidence, we relegate the historian to the role of mere archivist or journalist.

  Another reason why I agree with the speaker's characterization of the historian's proper function is that our understanding of history is richer and fuller as a result. By granting the historian license to interpret evidence--to "construct" history--we allow for differing viewpoints among historians. Based on the same essential evidence, two historians might disagree about such things as the contributing causes of a certain event, the extent of influence or impact of one event on subsequent events, the reasons and motives for the words and actions of important persons in history, and so forth. The inexorable result of disagreement, debate, and divergent interpretations among historians is a fuller and more incisive understanding of history.

  However, we should be careful not to confuse this license to interpret history, which is needed for any historian to contribute meaningfully to our understanding of it, with artistic license. The latter should be reserved for dramatists, novelists, and poets. It is one thing to attempt to explain historical evidence; it is quite another to invent evidence for the sake of creating a more interesting story or to bolster one's own point of view. A recently released biography of Ronald Reagan demonstrates that the line which historians should not cross is a fine one indeed. Reagan's biographer invented a fictional character who provided commentary as a witness to key episodes during Reagan's life. Many critics charge that the biographer overstepped his bounds as historian; the biographer claims, however, that the accounts in the biography were otherwise entirely factual, and that the fictional narrator was merely a literary device to aid the reader in understanding and appredating the historical Reagan.

  In sum, I strongly agree that the historian's proper function is to assemble evidence into plausible constructs of history, and that an element of interpretation and even creativity is properly involved in doing so. And if the speaker wishes to call these constructs "storytelling," that's fine. This does not mean, however, that historians can or should abandon scholarship for the sake of an interesting story.

  还有更多关于GMAT相关备考的内容请关注新东方在线GMAT频道,我们将第一时间将最新的GMAT备考经验分享给大家,同时也希望在考生们利用GMAT复习的同时,注重学习方法的总结,考出理想的成绩。

添加新东方美研助教回复【GRE】获取

模考真题|写作题库|阅读机经|佛脚词汇

更多资料
更多>>
  • GRE写作分数真的重要吗

    GRE写作分数真的重要吗,来本文和新东方在线雅思一起来看看详细信息。

    来源 : 网络综合整理 2022-03-10 18:18:27 关键字 : GRE写作 2022GRE考试

  • GRE写作常用高频词汇替换词

    GRE写作常用高频词汇替换词来啦,快来和新东方在线GRE一起来看看详细信息吧。

    来源 : 网络综合整理 2022-03-06 19:30:42 关键字 : GRE写作 GRE考试 2022GRE考试

  • GRE写作备考5点技巧

    相较于GRE Verbal 和 Math部分,GRE 写作长期以来不受大家的重视。但GRE是中国学生最弱的部分,如何进行GRE写作备考呢?来本文看看。

    来源 : 网络综合整理 2022-02-24 15:19:39 关键字 : GRE写作 2022GRE考试

  • GRE写作题目如何正确练习   

      为了帮助大家高效备考GRE,新东方在线GRE频道为大家带来GRE写作题目如何正确练习,希望对大家GRE备考有所帮助。更多精彩尽请关注新东方

    来源 : 网络 2021-01-25 13:23:00 关键字 : GRE写作 GRE

  • GRE写作考前的小练习   

      为了帮助大家高效备考GRE,新东方在线GRE频道为大家带来GRE写作考前的小练习,希望对大家GRE备考有所帮助。更多精彩尽请关注新东方在线

    来源 : 网络 2021-01-25 13:23:00 关键字 : GRE写作 GRE

  • GRE写作的标准了解   

      为了帮助大家高效备考GRE,新东方在线GRE频道为大家带来GRE写作的标准了解,希望对大家GRE备考有所帮助。更多精彩尽请关注新东方在线GR

    来源 : 网络 2021-01-25 13:23:00 关键字 : GRE写作 GRE

  • GRE写作的名言警句   

      为了帮助大家高效备考GRE,新东方在线GRE频道为大家带来GRE写作的名言警句,希望对大家GRE备考有所帮助。更多精彩尽请关注新东方在线GR

    来源 : 网络 2021-01-25 13:23:00 关键字 : GRE写作 GRE

  • GRE写作怎么应对高频题目   

      为了帮助大家高效备考GRE,新东方在线GRE频道为大家带来GRE写作怎么应对高频题目,希望对大家GRE备考有所帮助。更多精彩尽请关注新东方

    来源 : 网络 2021-01-25 13:23:00 关键字 : GRE写作 GRE

  • GRE写作提分的建议   

      为了帮助大家高效备考GRE,新东方在线GRE频道为大家带来GRE写作提分的建议,希望对大家GRE备考有所帮助。更多精彩尽请关注新东方在线GR

    来源 : 网络 2021-01-25 13:23:00 关键字 : GRE写作 GRE

  • GRE写作常用的词汇   

      为了帮助大家高效备考GRE,新东方在线GRE频道为大家带来GRE写作常用的词汇,希望对大家GRE备考有所帮助。更多精彩尽请关注新东方在线GR

    来源 : 网络 2021-01-25 13:23:00 关键字 : GRE写作 GRE

更多内容

关注新东方美研助教

回复【GRE】获取备考必看资料包

新东方美研备考资料
GRE录播课(全科班/单项班) GMAT6-8人直播VIP小班 托福直播精讲班(30天/60天)
更多>>
更多惊喜>>
更多>>
更多资料